In late 2025, Australia quietly passed the Online Safety Amendment Act, dramatically expanding the Australian Communications and Media Authority's (ACMA) power to block websites without court orders. If you're in Australia, this directly affects what you can access online.
What Changed?
The original Online Safety Act 2021 gave ACMA limited powers to issue takedown notices for specific types of harmful content. The 2025 amendment expanded these powers in three critical ways:
- No court order required. ACMA can now issue blocking orders directly to ISPs for any website it deems to host "class 1" or "class 2" material. Previously, this required a court process.
- Broader content categories. The definition of blockable content now includes sites that "facilitate access to" restricted material - meaning VPNs, and even educational resources about circumvention tools could be targeted.
- ISP compliance deadlines. Internet service providers must implement blocks within 48 hours of receiving an order, down from 30 days. Non-compliance carries fines of up to $500,000 per day.
What's Already Been Blocked?
Since the amendment took effect in January 2026, ACMA has issued blocking orders for over 200 websites. While the initial targets were largely adult content sites that failed age verification requirements, the scope has steadily expanded to include:
- Torrent sites and file-sharing platforms
- Academic paper sharing sites (Sci-Hub, Library Genesis)
- Several legitimate archive and research sites caught in overly broad blocking rules
- Multiple cryptocurrency-related services
⚠️ The Overblocking Problem
DNS-level blocking is a blunt instrument. When ACMA orders a domain blocked, it often catches subdomains and related services that have nothing to do with the targeted content. In February 2026, a blocking order targeting a single subdomain on archive.org temporarily disrupted access to the entire Wayback Machine for Australian users.
How Does This Compare Globally?
Australia's approach is now among the most aggressive in the Western world:
| Country | Court Order Required? | Scope | ISP Deadline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia | ❌ No | Broad (class 1 & 2 + "facilitating") | 48 hours |
| UK | Varies | Targeted (specific URLs) | 14 days |
| EU | Usually yes | Platform-level | Varies by member state |
| US | ✅ Yes | Narrow (court-ordered only) | Court-determined |
What Can You Do?
Overreach doesn't fix itself. If you think these laws go too far, here's how to push back:
- Contact your MP. Let them know you oppose warrantless website blocking. You can find your representative at aph.gov.au — a short, polite email goes further than you'd think.
- Support the organisations fighting it. Electronic Frontiers Australia, Digital Rights Watch, and the Australian Privacy Foundation are all actively challenging these laws.
- Share this article. The more people are aware, the harder it is to expand quietly.
In the Meantime, Protect Your Access
FDat! keeps your browsing uninterrupted. Smart Routing only redirects requests affected sites, everything else stays fast and direct. No software to install, no configuration, no logs.